Forwarded from the user list.
> For our (x)html exporter, we currently export individual images into the > same directory as the exported (x)html file, and then provide a fully > qualified path to them within the (x)html file. I want to ask whether > we want to keep it this way or change it such that the exported images > are referred to by a relative path. I think this way would be more > portable and flexible. I'm learning "C" currently so I'm not sure I should comment? but what is being suggested makes sense to me and that is should be relative. > > In the same vein, do we want to create a new directory (I was thinking > of something along the lines of ${filename}_d) which will hold the image > files for the document? I was thinking that this would have the > advantage that if a user wants to move the document around (such as to > the web server tree), then he or she only has to move the .html file and > the directory with the images in parallel with one another, and nothing > breaks. It seems easier to use, to me. same here as above for flexibility yes.
