>So, consider this my introduction to a series of messages where I'll
describe
>the following de facto policies:
[...]
> - adding an XP dependency on a peer library
> - upgrading peer libraries
[...]
I can't wait to read about these topics. I am trying to keep the BeOS
build
in sync but I had many toubles building libiconv. And BeOS isn't the
only
affected platform according to the posts here.
Why are we trying to supply our own Makefiles for peer libraries ? Do
we really need a specific build for these libraries ? The default
building
procedure looks fine to me and it seems to be much more XP than our
makefile. And it just works.
Stephane
