I remembered some sort of discussion like you mention, but I too thought
this new patch was to be some kind of replacement for the current lists
dialog which seemed kind of strange to me and certainly confusing. I had
to dig up the appropriate thread. Here it is.
  
http://www.abiword.org/mailinglists/abiword-dev/01/June/0059.html

and a reply to that post goes into more detail.

http://www.abiword.org/mailinglists/abiword-dev/01/June/0087.html

Hope that helps clear things up.

Cheers,
Tim

On 24 Aug 2001 14:26:26 -0700, Paul Rohr wrote:
> At 04:18 PM 8/21/01 +1000, Martin Sevior wrote:
> >       I'm now not willing to let our Modeless Lists dialog go without
> >a lot of convincing. Having just used the Word 2000 dialog, I think our
> >Lists UI is much nicer and easier to use, including the Modeless Lists
> >dialog.
> 
> Martin, 
> 
> I know you're very proud of your current dialog, and we all appreciate the 
> many hours of hard work you did to create it.  However, I don't see the 
> connection here.  To date, I haven't heard anyone ask you to let that work 
> go.  
> 
> How familiar are you with the approach Joaqu�n was taking?  At this point, I 
> can't even see screen shots, much less play with running code, and I'd like 
> to.  (That's why I asked for it.)  Do you mean to discourage Joaqu�n from 
> getting his work in shape so the rest of us can see it, and judge it on its 
> own merits?  If so, please don't.  
> 
> IIRC, there was an evolving consensus earlier this year that it'd be nice to 
> have a total of two dialogs for manipulating lists:
> 
>   - an ultra-simple all-XP gallery of bullet/number choices, AND
>   - a more powerful full-strength customization dialog.  
> 
> The first would give people a quick, customizable set of choices, so if they 
> see a preview they like, they can just select it and move on.  Or, if they 
> want anything else, they could click through to a more powerful dialog (like 
> you've already implemented) where they could tweak to their heart's content.  
> 
> Ideally, those customizations could be assigned to one of the preview panes 
> in the first dialog, so that the next time you want to format another list, 
> you could quickly and easily reuse your prior work. 
> 
> AFAIK, that's the kind of thing Joaqu�n was working on, and I, for one, 
> would love to see how something like that might work.  Are you suggesting 
> that we shouldn't even consider such an approach?  If so, why?  
> 
> Paul,
> very puzzled
> 
> 



Reply via email to