According to Martin Sevior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've built on your work to implement the construction of the
> properties associated with the style. It needs more work but were 90% of
> the way there. These now get written out to the style definitions.
[...]
I wouldn't have been eager to have that feature implemented, I would have
rejected your patch for not being contextual...
(it actually broke my tree, I have had to find out why...)
Don't take it personnally, just wanted to remind every patcher to use "cvs
diff -c" to generate patches that are safe.
Hub
