On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 17:42, Jared Davis wrote: > On September 26, I proposed that we adopt a standard release strategy and > proivded a draft document. No discussion resulted from this. > I would like to re-suggest this. I would like to point out that at present: > + Savannah does not have several packages that are on SourceForge: > (MacOS package, Source RPM, Source Tarball, Win32 package)
Savannah had the src.rpm, but my experiences with rsync failed and I did not have the time to put there the src.rpm (read: I was hungry like a starving lion). There are new rpms up; there that identify a little more on their nature. > I would really appreciate it if we could coordinate the release of packages > better and get a truly comprehensive release strategy into place. Yes, I don't like to discover that I have to have packages two days from now, all of a sudden, so I have rpms in time. I'd really rather have: release is tagged, make packages until next week. After having the packages, announce. > I've attached my initial proposal for your review. Can we agree on this or > something similar? I have nothing to add, the document seemed a fine work as I read it. Hugs, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
