> According to Dom Lachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Unix pthread_mutex_t impl committed. Win32 CRITICAL_SECTION impl > > committed. Other implementations (Mac, QNX, Be, ...) are welcomed > > and > > shouldn't be too hard. Note that I don't want an XP thread class * > > yet*. > > Comments appreciated, as always. I wanted to make this as simple as > > possible.
I was just wondering whether rwlocks would be more appropriate or not. > For BeOS, it will be trivial (BLock class). I read the implementation for unix. It uses pthread_mutex'es. BLocks are recursive mutexes. Maybe we should avoid such a difference in the BeOS implementation. Or maybe, we could just define XP mutexes as recursive mutexes... ;-) > For Mac, a little less. I'll see what I'll do, but later. > For Cocoa, it is already here (using POSIX) Stephane
