> There's no duplicated functionality here, really. The old XHTML importer
> is deprecated and no one is working on it. FJF is working on a
> libxml2-based HTML and XHTML importer, and it's more robust and more
> functional than the older one. After 1.0 I plan on dumping the old
> importer for this when we move ~90% of imp/exp to abiword-plugins.
Is no one maintaining the XHTML importer? I thought we were maintaining
round-trip XHTML at least.
I haven't really looked at the XHTML importer in months, so I can't really
compare functionality.
Also, I don't know how well the libxml2 HTML importer handles valid XHTML
- though maybe fine.
Regards, Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again.
That's how we know we're alive: we're wrong.
--- Philip Roth
