> I haven't read the rest of the file, nor do I have any experience with
> exporters. But I'm surprised to see use of char and sprintf. Surely you
> want to use the UT_ versions of these?
>
> [snip]
> > + char buff[20];
> [snip]
> > + sprintf(buff,"%d ",*pTemp);
> [snip]
Is there a UT_ version of this? Anyway, looks safe & sane to me.
Frank
Francis James Franklin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's getting them wrong that is living, getting them wrong and wrong and
wrong and then, on careful reconsideration, getting them wrong again.
That's how we know we're alive: we're wrong.
--- Philip Roth
