On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
> I've been growing a little impatient about this:
>
> * I sacrificed a machine to be pure RH 7.2 to reduce dependency
> problems
> * I give myself the trouble of making i386/i686/gtk/gnome/bidi
> combinations AND I have to be present for each of them since I SIGN
> them with gpg, putting in practice a method that I've been preaching
> instead of just talking about it.
>
> Given this, I want to know:
> Why are the rpms I did not the official rpms?
> Why is http://savannah.gnu.org/download/abiword is not even mentioned
> (not even as an alternative download site)?
>
> I don't have any problem with Maurer, we're all entitle to cooperate as
> we see best fit to our abilities, but I've been doing a rather competent
> work in this area so I am, naturally, a little concerned: why do I even
> bother trying to make a good job that is starting to seem like it is
> being intentionally ignored?
Because he did them right away and uploaded them to sourceforge thus
saving me lots of time.
Why confuse people with two download sites?
Cheers
Martin
