On 03/25/02 Dom Lachowicz wrote: > > Whatever it is, I know that Miguels rant about Ximian's reasoning for > > Mono (the massive time spent on Evolution development - I forget the > > number, but it was a factor >10 over what they'd expected) is starting > > to get to me. > > FWIW, C# or Java isn't going to be much better. In fact, no programming > language is a godsend and will make all of our work easy and make all of > our bugs go away. Mono will be better for Evolution, probably, but you > have to consider that these guys are using a self-created object > heirarchy based on C and structs-as-vtables, without many of the
FYI C++ works in the same way, with structs as vtables, only you didn't check a C++ compiler sources to see how it works. > language features that BOTH C++ and C# offer. Care to name a C# feature we don't support (or we don't plan to support)? Actually, the runtime supports more features than C# the language offers. But, yes, we are not done yet, we know that. lupus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] debian/rules [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monkeys do it better
