On Thu, 2002-04-18 at 09:08, H�vard Wigtil wrote: > I'm trying clean up the mime types for Abiword in Gnome.
That would be text/abiword IIRC. > One problem is that there is some confusion on what the executable name > should be. IIRC, in older releases there used to be in /usr/bin an > "AbiWord" link to the executable, where as recent releases only ship > with an "abiword" link. (And the link is not part of the files listed in > the RPM, which is IMHO bad.) The link is there, just try to do: rpm -q abiword --scripts Besides, a user that would be confused with that, probably doesn't even know how to do rpm -ivh file.rpm. > Alex Larson seemed to remember a statement to the effect that you would > always ship a "AbiWord" binary or link. > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/gnome-vfs/2002-March/001142.html I did not ever hear such, if that was the intention, I had no idea. > So what's the official policy on this? If the official policy is to only > ship "abiword", when was the last release shipped with an "AbiWord" > link? And do you remember if previous releases shipped with both > "abiword" and "AbiWord"? I don't think there's any need for both, and lower case strings is the standard (real standard or de facto? I don't know) for unix aplications. Hugs, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
