On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 15:52, Martin Sevior wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Dom Lachowicz wrote: > > 1.0 cannot be aborted because it is already live. You can't abort a live > > child. > > However, I'm not opposed to a 1.0.1 due out on Friday. > > * Hopefully the bonobo stuff will be worked out in autoconf-land. I'm > > not entirely opposed to making bonobo required for the GNOME platform. I don't have any oposition. Gnome requires bonobo, AFAICT, so if you run the gnome build you already have bonobo. The point is: does it add (or hopefully not) stability problems? If not, go ahead and include it in 1.0.1
> I vote for a 1.0.1 release on Friday too. Then this sets the day I return to Lisboa, so rpms will be ready on Sunday night (GMT+1). hugs, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
