I've also said that gtk2 depends on pango. So, if your favorite platform has gtk2... then...
Hugs, rms On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 23:09, Blue Lizard wrote: > Emm...see hub's correction. According to debian, pango depends on > glib2, not even gtk. > > On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 20:29, Robert G. Werner wrote: > > I think that the feeling about Solaris is that all the Gnome libs are > > being ported to Solaris and in fact the rumor is that Gnome will be > > part of the default install for Solaris 9 (or is it 10 now?). > > > > Personally, I hated CDE and would love to see it replaced with > > something prettier and more configurable/customizable (i.e. > > Gnome/KDE). As a system administrator, I love the idea of having > > Gnome/GTK+ come pre-installed in Solaris because so much interesting > > software is coming to depend on these toolkits. > > > > Anyway, I don't think Solaris would be the OS with lack of Gnome > > problems. More likely in that case is soemthing like SCO or DEC/Open > > Unix, or so I would guess not being a user of either ;-). > > -- > > Robert G. Werner > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 2001/9/11 > > > > I'm a Hollywood writer; so I put on a sports jacket and take off my brain. > > > > On 25 Apr 2002, Blue Lizard wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > Are there not solaris users without gnome/pango? > > > I always liked cde, and few administrators (or, few that I know) are > > > gonna wanna install pango stuff for the sake of one word processor. > > > > > > (naturally, I intend to offer arguments for and against both sides) > > > > > > -MG > > > -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
