Our own Robert Wilhelm (row) was a founder of Freetype and could be of some use here, maybe. He's been surprisingly silent on the issue :)
The only patented bits in the TrueType spec, IIRC, relate to true-type hinting at small font sizes (<10pt). Freetype has an actual implementation which parses and honors those bits of data to produce awesome looking glyphs at small font sizes. It also has an auto-hinter which doesn't pay attention to those specific bits and produces less-than-stellar looking glyphs. This is all determined at compile-time. If we were to release our own binaries where *we* shipped freetype *statically* linked into the binary, we would probably be safest disabling the code that breaches apple's patent, unless we would have to setup our download in a country where Apple's patent isn't valid/honored. However, many linux/unix distros ship versions of freetype which have the hinting code enabled. We could easily ship an AbiWord which dynamically links against freetype.so or freetype.dll, and let the packager sort things our (i.e. on win32) or the user (i.e. on linux). This is the route that I would recommend - we avoid patent issues while still getting great results. But then again, I don't have too much sympathy for people who complain that fonts look crappy at <10 points. Dom On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 09:55, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > > > Where does Apple hold these patents? > From the docs that accompany the latest stable release, I > understand USA and Japan, but that might not be accurate -- the > FreeType document is not certain about this and it is dated 1999. > > > To what extent can we turn this on and then have a HUGE DISCLAIMER that > > Americans and others with crazy patent laws may not use it. According > > to FreeType.org some distributions turn it on by default. > It needs to be pointed out, that this does not need to be turned on at all, > FT has its own algorithms for dealing with the patented issues, and from > what I understand, they work quite nicely (perhaps Leonard would be a > better person to comment on this). But I think if it comes to it, we should not > provide official releases with the patented stuff enabled. > > Tomas > > ********************************************* > [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.frydrych.net > PGP keys: http://www.frydrych.net/contact.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
