okay so i misread the message, my bad.
but as the zlib license is so free and i dont think we actually make any changes to it anyway it does not matter one whit that we dont spell out the fact that it is in fact NOT covered by the GPL (unless the developers are really over zealous about the GPL, Richard Stallman warns against relicensing stuff as GPL from BSD style licenses just for the sake of it) Later Alan On Tue, 7 May 2002, F J Franklin wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 10:06:15 +0100 (BST) > From: F J Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Zlib License [Re: About AbiWord vs OEONE] > > > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Mike Nordell wrote: > > > This I think might be something. We are using e.g. zlib, but does the > > > distribution "clearly state" that zlib isn't covered by a GNU license? > ----- > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Alan Horkan wrote: > > zlib covered by the GPL? > > i would have sworn it was covered by the zlib/png license > > er? > >
