Tomas Frydrych wrote: > The way you avoid conflicts of the type "I mark it as deleted and > you put it back in", is that, while in the revisions mode, you do not > allow a text marked as to be deleted to be un-marked, instead the > person who wants it back would have to retype it.
Overall, within my limited understanding, your entire post sounds like a good analysis and proposal. (And I like "Word style" display of revisions, e.g., deletions shown in strike through.) I would like confirmation that the limitation on unmarking a deletion is only in a special "revisions mode" -- this does not disable "undo" in other modes? Randy Kramer
