On Sat, 2002-05-18 at 21:26, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > > In combination the sequential revisions handling and ability to > merge would make it possible to implement a scenario of any > complexity. >
I agree with this. Could we implement an internal 'de-merge' for the cases where you want to take a revision out of the middle? This is a bit vague as an idea, but you'd have two versions of the doc, one where all of 4's revisions are accepted, and one where they're only accepted if they don't have any other revision marks on. Actually, the latter might be the best way to do a global accept of just 4 -- and then warn the user that there are conflicts to resolve. -- David Chart
