On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 19:52, Martin Sevior wrote: > > Hi Dom, > I just read your gtk-2.0 porting guide. It all makes good sense to > me except for one item: > > Make signal callbacks private static member functions > > Would this mean that the gnome build could not inherit these callbacks?
Hi Martin, For dialogs, there will be next to no difference (if at all) between the GTK+ and GNOME versions. In fact, many of the gnome/ subtrees (or their contents) will be going away. GNOME specific bits, where necessary and appropriate, will be housed in unix/ hiding behind #ifdef HAVE_GNOME logic. Why is a good chunk of the GNOME port going away? Most of the GNOME-specific stuff that we used has been deprecated and pushed up into GTK+ proper (and improved upon there). Specifically, this relates to GnomeDialogs and stock buttons/icons. We will still have our GNOME port. I plan on still using Gnome-Print, a Bonobo-based XAP_App/AP_App, GConf for our preferences, GAL, EEL, ... all where appropriate. Hope this clears things up. Dom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
