On Sat, 2002-06-08 at 21:26, Mark Gilbert wrote: > 1) Plugins will be bundled. KJD set a great example with his bundles, > we're gonna implement at packager level. So far just IE and TOOLS.
That may be too bundled (specially in the case of HEAD but we're talking about STABLE), but wth. > 2) Instead of 2 gtk and 2 gnome (with and without bidi), we should > have one of each, bidi-enabled. For me, it's two less items in a list on a pwetty basic shell script, so I don't mind at all to keep providing rpms with bidi and without bidi on STABLE. > 3) If we can build the application on a given architecture, we should > be able to build the rpms on that architecture. if --target ARCH works fine for cross compiling to athlon, sparc, etc, it's just a matter of adding a couple of items to another list on the same shell script. > Note that if a plugin either doesn't build or is useless (freetrans, > eg,festvox) it got removed from this version of the spec. Naturally > some are to be put back when (re)written. fine by me. > I'm fairly certain that this incarnation of the spec doesn't work out-of-box, > but I can't do any more with it right now not having a working copy of rpm. > I'm sure uwog and Sc0tt will fix it up all pretty and nice-like. It does work out of the box, maybe not with make ...=rpm but it does work with out of the box rh7.3 by adding abiword.spec to the root of the tar.gz that has the source. Cheers, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
