--- Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there not a more generic way to import unknown > tags?
Actually I don't know but these are not unknown tags. As a first implementation we can treat them as "do nothing" tags. Later on we'll do the right thing with them. > And while you are looking at this part of the code i > was wondering if > abiword allows/preserves tags of the form <? blah ?> > or if <!-- comments > survive intact --> > i have been meaning to test this out for myself but > got distracted... That's a good question and my bet is that we don't preserve such things. Whether we ought to is open for debate. Andrew Dunbar. > Sincerely > Alan Horkan > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:27:59 +0100 (BST) > From: "[iso-8859-1] Andrew Dunbar" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: AbiWord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Commit (HEAD): Fix HTML plugin > > --- "j.m.maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > Fix typo that broke the build > > Sorry about that. I have CVS but no compiler. > I'm trying to do some work on Bug 3662. > I've added new tags <ruby>, <rt>, and <rp>. > For now we need to treat them just as <span> and > accept all text inside them without doing anything > special. > We're currently ignoring anything inside them which > results in dataloss in documents that use ruby. > > <snip> > ===== http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net http://www.abisource.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
