On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:08:35PM -0400, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> I think that he is advocating removing snprintf and replacing it with 
> something else, which may or may not be sprintf. The problem seems to 
> be that snprintf isn't available on some of the more 'exotic' 
> platforms, like HP/UX 10.20. I personally could never advocate removing 
> snprintf to be removed for the less-secure sprintf.

glib2 has g_snprintf to help ameliorate the 'exotic'ness

Reply via email to