Andrew Dunbar wrote: > I think the first and most important step here is to > build a very full and descriptive list of all the > quirks, and hopefully decide what a 100% quirk-free > bidi algorithm would be. Is the Unicode bidi > algorithm perfect if everybody implemented it perfectly?
It doesn't really matter if it's ideal, it's the only one we've got ;) But cf. http://crl.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/ucdata.html > I think I've seen these kinds of quirks in Hebrew with > hyphens connecting Hebrew endings to English words. > I got varied results between different Unicode > editors, mozilla, and IE; and more variation depending on > whether I used the ASCII hyphen or the special Hebrew > hyphen. I think World.abw contains this example. > > Is this one of the known quirks? Yes, see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73251 . Summary: Mozilla is right, IE is wrong ;) Al.
