> Anyway, why I'm asking is that there's a way to encode images in URLs so > that they can be embedded into [X]HTML, but the method wasn't designed for > large images and there's an open question of whether all XML parsers can > handle such long attributes. With 788 bytes I'm estimating a URL of 1074 > bytes which is probably safe & justifiable...
If you used base64, sizes could be disgustingly huge. What technique were you thinking of using?
