On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 12:22, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > Almost what I want although I would have name the class "Impl" and not > "Helper" because it really is the implementation. But never mind. That > is just being nitpicky.
Sounds like a good change to me. Not sure why I didn't do this initially, come to think of it. I will do this. > > The good news: This will ultimately result in less duplicated code (I > > haven't started placing platform-independant abi frame code into > > AP_Frame class, I will soon!) and better model-view-controller > > seperation (it should be somewhat easier to grok the frame code when > > this is all finished). > > YUM. Now the game is to intermix Cocoa Obj-C MVC model with Abi C++ MVC > model for the Cocoa port. Fun thing. Are there any particular considerations/requirements for the XP layer that I should keep in mind? > > Overall, I think this is a win. I will continue to polish the XP and > > UNIX code to make it better. I will need help from platform maintainers > > to bring the Win32/QNX code to this new system. > > > > Perhaps we can close that "early" (aka 3 digits) bug soon :-) > > Will, I'm 100% with you and will try to follow the UNIX implementation. A MacOS X port would be uber-cool. Glad to see we're one step closer to this goal. Cheers, -- William Lachance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
