F J Franklin wrote: > I don't think it's our job to fix popt's errors. popt is in CVS rpm, if > you feel like fixing it anyway...
Damn, I completely missed it was a popt-problem. No, obviously this is something for the popt-maintainer(s) (and I'm an idiot :-) ). /Mike It seems *nix libs often disagree when it comes to const correctness...
