> FT2 has an api for transforms, and so if xft does > not, we should file > an xft bug. However, just because we cannot do this > on Unix, we > should not force the Unix limitations on the XP > code. Since > transform is the standard, and also most efficient, > way in which > scaling should be handled, we should have the XP > code assuming > transforms and then the platform code implementing > the behaviour in > whatever manner is best on the given platform.
Tomas, For the 5th time, we are not forcing this on XP code. This is a Unix workaround done solely in the Unix codebase. You are free to handle zooming however you want in the Win32 code, which can quite probably be done better than how we handled the Unix implementation. With Cuenca's help, we'll probably have a way to apply a transform to an FT_Face object. If you can apply a transform, then great. This was the best we could come up with in the Unix solution to fulfill our XP API. Please stop commenting on things without having a working understanding of the code at hand. Dom __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com
