As another opinion, I would concur that going through RTF is preferable to
having support for converting from many formats. Stability and generality is
better than many special options -- each of which may contain implementation
errors.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John H. Raines, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:49 AM
Subject: Fwd: Lotus Wordpro format convertor?
>
> *********** BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE ***********
>
> On 5/4/01 at 5:07 PM Nicholas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any likelyhood of a lotus wordpro convertor for abiword?
>
> I'm using it at present for reading doc format and its great. Once I move
towards replacing my windows desktops I'll have probably a thousand or so
wordpro documents to convert over.
>
> Nicholas
>
> *********** END FORWARDED MESSAGE ***********
>
> It would seem that it would be nice to add this after Ver. 1 (ie an
enhancement). However, to cover all formats is an intimidating task that
may be more than can be handled with available resources. Maybe ever.
Making RTF robust may still be the best bet. The cost of converting 1000
documents vs free, stable, useful software doesn't seem all the great.
>
> Regards,
> J. Raines
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
> unsubscribe in the message body.
-----------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word
unsubscribe in the message body.
