Hi Jani, Am Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012, 14:42:28 schrieb Jani Monoses: > Hi Marc, others, > > what are the ac100 kernel plans that could be relevant for the Ubuntu > 12.10 cycle?
unfortunately, not much change :-( As ogra suggested on IRC, we could try 3.1 kernel (based on the nv-tegra sources), but it needs fixing the text console. Maybe someone with more experiences (maybe at canonical) can check where the problem comes from. I have no idea... > Do you know what the status of mainlining tegra2 and ac100 bits is? there is progress ;-) There also exist a "prove of concept" patch to get the display up (very basic kms driver, which will be the base for future developemnt). It needs a xf86- video-modesetting driver. I already filed a wishlist bug to include it. A working tree is in my for-next branch on gitorious, but don't expect too much. I think we should not depend on this kernel. There is also an unfinished chromeos-3.2 branch on nv-tegra.nvidia.com, I don't know what the plans are with this one. For my taste, there are too many different kernels already. So to be on the save side, we should use a 3.1 kernel and maybe also a "mainline" version for "experiemental" use. Marc _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ac100 Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ac100 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
