Hi, 2009/7/6 Philippe d'Anfray <philippe.d-anf...@cea.fr>: > Bonjour, > > I launched rat manually with the same parameter "as in the venue". It > works normally then > the messages are issued all together just before the rat window > disappears. > The first time a segfault was reported in the logs but not the second > time. > The 'Bad address' error (according to 'man errno') corresponds to the "EFAULT" error which for recvfrom() indicates: "EFAULT The receive buffer pointer(s) point outside the process'€™s address space". This points to a memory bug in RAT/common - I've not see this particular error before - we'll need to try to work out what is causing it.... Do you see any thing happen before RAT crashes - e.g. do you click on a particular button, or does a particular participant join the session or does this always happen after a set amount of time. Can you see if it correlates to any other event or is totally random?
Thanks, Piers. > Cordialement > > Philippe > > aristote@aristotest4:~$ rat -4.4.01 -C MARCEL -S > 8168306a1e5b045610539184ffd9c0d5 -f L16-16K-Mono > accessgrid-bridge.renater.fr/50064 > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > aristote@aristotest4:~$ rat -4.4.01 -C MARCEL -S > 8168306a1e5b045610539184ffd9c0d5 -f L16-16K-Mono > accessgrid-bridge.renater.fr/50064 > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > recvfrom: Bad address > Not enough memory > aristote@aristotest4: > > > Message in the log for the first crash: > > Jul 6 13:29:43 aristotest4 kernel: [ 1393.943534] rat-4.4.01-medi[4973]: > segfault at 0 ip 0809735a sp bfa365e0 error 6 in > rat-4.4.01-media[8048000+6f000] > > > > > Christoph Willing a écrit : >> >> On 02/07/2009, at 1:22 AM, D'ANFRAY Philippe wrote: >> >>> Bonjour, >>> >>> We're running AG 3.2 beta 1 with Ubuntu 9.04. The machine has a >>> creative sound card and we're running the linux driver >>> (/XFiDrv_Linux_Public_US_1.00). After a few minutes rat always >>> crashes i.e. the rat window just disappears and there's no message if >>> we run in debug mode. >>> >>> I eventually found messages like the following(s) in the log >>> files (but not everytime): >>> >>> Jun 29 17:38:02 aristotest4 kernel: [16153.505141] >>> rat-4.4.01-medi[14426]: segfault at 0 ip 080910c7 sp bfe2bcc0 error 6 >>> in rat-4.4.01-media[8048000+6f000] >>> >>> Jun 29 13:21:53 aristotest4 kernel: [ 784.482769] >>> rat-4.4.01-medi[4790]: segfault at 0 ip 0809355c sp bfdb7f40 error 4 >>> in rat-4.4.01-media[8048000+6f000] >> >> >> Philippe, >> >> As a test, could you run rat from a terminal command line, with >> something like: >> rat 233.45.67.89/45678 >> >> and let it run till it crashes and then report any output that appears >> in the terminal please? >> >> >> chris >> >> >> Christoph Willing +61 7 3365 8316 >> QCIF Access Grid Manager >> University of Queensland >> >> > >