Congrats John et al.

I couldn't agree more with your comments.

I hope everyone understands that QA is not like a driver's license exam
- where you'll be banned from AG'ing if you fail (although that is an
interesting idea ;-)) QA testing is all about increasing quality of
nodes and making sure everyone is aware of the tips/tricks and best
practices that ensure high quality and ease of administration.  As you
mentioned John, even for a veteran, it is amazing how useful just going
through the process is.

Congrats again.

Todd

--
Collaboration & Visualization Specialist
UBC Okanagan - http://web.ubc.ca/okanagan
WestGrid - www.westgrid.ca
Ph. 250-807-9979
Todd Zimmerman - [email protected]


On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:49 -0600, John I. Quebedeaux, Jr wrote:
> Thanks Jason.
>
> I'll comment that despite our LSU node being in use since it's installation 
> in 2002 (has it been that long?) and i'm probably above average in knowing 
> how to set things up, the process actually helped me improve the node even 
> more, I thank Jason for his time (16 hours ahead of mine!).
>
> I'll be working to get all the Louisiana nodes up to this status now, then 
> will see if I can help anyone else. The process generates fantastic feedback 
> (pardon the puns!), which I can’t imagine any site not wanting some objective 
> comments and insight – often improving something on the spot if it isn’t 
> already good. Sites can use this to probably get improvements made they've 
> been needing, how often is the tool not a priority for improvement and yet 
> it’s a critical system for communication.... In most cases it will reassure 
> the site that they'll be meeting with a node that is... Good, if not Great. 
> and the least of your worries will be the technology.
>
> I heartily recommend everyone to do this, I regret not doing it sooner.
>
> Like many, I’ve been intending to do this and hadn’t gotten it done. Despite 
> that, I really do recommend sites take the time to get this done – I 
> challenge anyone to do this before the next AG Retreat timeframe. I think it 
> really means something to confirm this status on your nodes that meet the 
> requirements easily already. For those who are “afraid” they’ll “fail” - it’s 
> an excellent opportunity to improve your node. The “tester” has a great deal 
> of experience and will be able to help you. I was nervous, but that just 
> served for me to review all my procedures, functions, capabilities, and I 
> think honestly that just makes it better. All nodes have “weak spots” - mine 
> certainly does. So does Jason’s. It’s recognizing them and fixing them where 
> they can be fixed and compensating for them where needed or dealing with it. 
> Identifying these officially may help you get what you need to fix them, 
> otherwise – why do you have an Access Grid node if y!
ou’re not going to have a good communication/collaboration tool? Too many of us 
have suffered by joining nodes who weren’t “up to par”  and the frustration 
involved.
>
> In our state, it’s probably one of the most productive, long distance, 
> collaborative, tool used over the span of time we’ve been using this 
> technology and we will be continuing to use it – if our NIH grant can be 
> renewed for 5 more years after 2010, we’ll be looking at ways of enhancing 
> the quality and ease of use, of course, but quality assurance means a great 
> deal to know our nodes are “good” ones. Louisiana now boasts over 20 room 
> installations and we’re starting to bridge the gap with IOCOM nodes (although 
> something needs to be done about compatibility on the h.264 video issue 
> between AG and IOCOM.... As they don’t seem to be compatible – separate 
> thread!) I’m not sure exactly where the desktop nodes will fit in in the 
> future meetings, as I have many admins (not computer admins!) who want to 
> simply join from their office now that they’re getting better network 
> connections there.
>
> I’m rambling now, so I’ll leave it at that for now!
>
> Cheers,
>
> -John Q.
> --
> John I. Quebedeaux, Jr.; Louisiana State University
> Computer Manager LBRN; 131 Life Sciences Bldg.
> e-mail: [email protected]; web: http://lbrn.lsu.edu
> phone: 225-578-0062 / fax: 225-578-2597
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From: Jason Bell <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:57:37 +1000
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [AG-TECH] LSU (U.S.) AG node achieves QA Status
>
> Dear Colleagues
>
> I am delighted to inform you that today the "Louisiana State University, 
> Biological Sciences Access Grid Node" achieveed Quality Assurance Status.  It 
> should be node that this is the first Access Grid node in the United States 
> to achieve the Global Quality Assurance status.
>
> More importantly, John I Quebedeaux Jr has accepted the position for QA 
> tester for the region of Louisiana State within the United States.
>
> A current list of Regional testers can be found at 
> http://www.accessgrid.org/qatesters <http://www.accessgrid.org/qatesters> . I 
> would invite anyone else considering  becoming a Regional QA Tester for the 
> Access Grid to consider the following prerequisites:
>
> •       Your node must be “Quality Assured” (this is generally done by me);
>
> •       You would need to undergo some basic training (about an hour’s 
> worth); and
>
> •       It would be preferable if you have been using Access Grids on a 
> regular basis for some time.
>
> If you are interested, please don’t hesitate to contact me!!!
>
> For those who wish to obtain Quality Assured Status, it is recommended that 
> you:
>
> •       Read http://www.accessgrid.org/node/493 
> <http://www.accessgrid.org/node/493>  to find out the test requirements for 
> the quality assurance process.
>
> •       Read http://www.accessgrid.org/node/352 
> <http://www.accessgrid.org/node/352>  to obtain hints and tips on getting 
> your Access Grid Node up to the required high standard.
>
> •       The website http://www.accessgrid.org/node/705 
> <http://www.accessgrid.org/node/705>  highlights the marking sheets.  These 
> are the same marking sheets that "we" as QA testers will use.
>
> •       Contact your local regional QA AG tester, as a list of QA testers can 
> be found at http://www.accessgrid.org/qatesters 
> <http://www.accessgrid.org/qatesters> .
>
> Once again, congratulations to the work of " Louisiana State University, 
> Biological Sciences Access Grid Node” in its effort for achieving such a high 
> quality standard.
>
> Thanks for your time,
>
> Jason
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Jason Bell, B.I.T. (Honours)
>
> Research Systems Support Officer
>
> Information Technology Division
>
> CQ University Australia
>
> Australian Research Collaboration Service
>
> http://www.arcs.org.au/ <http://www.arcs.org.au/>
>
> E-mail : [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>
> Work   : +61 7 4930 9229
>
> Mobile : 0409 630897
>
> Postal : Building 19
>
>         Central Queensland University
>
>         Bruce Highway
>
>         Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia, 4702
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Patience is a virtue.
>
> But if I wanted Patience,
>
> I would have become a Doctor.
>
> --------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to