I seem to have the same problem but haven't had time to troubleshoot.... FC5 here.
-John Q. -- John I. Quebedeaux, Jr.; Louisiana State University Computer Manager LBRN; 131 Life Sciences Bldg. e-mail: jo...@lsu.edu; web: http://lbrn.lsu.edu phone: 225-578-0062 / fax: 225-578-2597 > From: Fred Dech <fd...@uchicago.edu> > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:35:38 -0500 > To: AG TECH <ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov> > Subject: [AG-TECH] AG3 Bridge issue > > Hi. > > I've been running a bridge on and off for some time and still run into > the same annoying issue. After the Bridge process runs for some period of > time and the amount of activity (Quickbridge processes spawned and destroyed) > goes past a certain point, the Bridge stops functioning properly. It no > longer identifies itself to the registry and no new entries are added > to the log file. I've tried different FC5 and FC6 platforms, assuming that > this problem was machine specific, but this behavior has not changed. I > also tried running Bridge as root, thinking that I was running into some kind > of restricted buffer limit. No difference. > > The last thing normally logged is some attempts to create new bridges: > 04/25/07 14:26:31 -1208707392 Toolkit Bridge:57 INFO Bridge request: > mcast 224.2.207.27 59822 > 04/25/07 14:26:31 -1208707392 Toolkit BridgeFactory.py:110 INFO Method > CreateBridge called > 04/25/07 14:26:31 -1208707392 Toolkit BridgeFactory.py:116 INFO Allocated > port = 50076 > 04/25/07 14:26:31 -1208707392 Toolkit BridgeFactory.py:123 INFO - using > existing bridge > > and the BridgeFactory uses an existing bridge. > > Then the last item in the log is usually the destruction of all the bridges. > After that the Bridge might as well not be running, because it doesn't show > up in the registry. > The only think to do at this point is to kill and restart the bridge. > > Does this sound familiar to anyone? > I'd appreciate any comments or suggestions. > > Thanks. > > --fred >
