Ah, yes.. i forgot to tell about the bridge... We will use our "workaround" meanwhile it is not solved.
Thax a lot Tom! Thomas D. Uram escribió: > Natalia: > > It sounds like you are using a bridge. If so, the problem is that the > bridge only > sends data to a single application per machine, so only one of your > vic instances > will get video data from the bridge. This is a known bug in our > bugzilla. > > If you are not using a bridge, please let us know, as this would be some > strange behavior. > > Thanks, > Tom > > > > > Natalia Costas wrote: > >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> Giving a hand to our collegues at the University of Extremadura, we >> found a problem. Maybe someone knows the solution. The problem arises >> with a one machine node with two capture cards: >> >> They have 2 videoproducer services + 1 videoconsumer. The problem is >> that the videofeeds go to any of the vics (video producer of >> videoconsumer) randomly... so.. sometimes the videoconsumer vic >> receives nothing (but the videoproducer vic does), and it starts >> receiving the feeds only when i close one of the video producer vics. >> >> The only workaround i've found is to add 2 video services (so any of >> them receive the feeds and are unmuted). Both receive all the feeds, >> but i dont like that solution very much. I am afraid it might have >> some impact on performance (the videostreams are delivered to two >> different applications...) >> >> Thanx a lot in advance, >> Kind regards. >> > > -- ================================================= Natalia Costas Lago E-mail: nata...@cesga.es Centro de Supercomputacion de Galicia (CESGA) Avenida de Vigo, s/n (Campus Sur) 15705 Santiago de Compostela - SPAIN Tel: +34 981 56 98 10 Fax: +34 981 59 46 16 http://www.cesga.es/ =================================================
