Dear Adam, I am sorry about the problem. This one-directional multicast problem is really a serious problem in deploying AG Connector.
Until now, users under fully multicast-disconnected network can use AG Connector. I will try to solve this problem. I am sorry and thank you for trying AG Connector. - Namgon > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Carter [mailto:a...@epcc.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 9:47 PM > To: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov > Cc: braitma...@hlrs.de > Subject: [AG-TECH] Problems using AG Connector > > Hi to anyone who's tried out AG Connector... > > Michael Braitmaier and I spent about an hour this morning experimenting with > AG Connector. We're having some difficulties getting it to work, and I > wonder if anyone could cast some light on the problem. We tried various > different combinations of Multicast/Unicast/UMTP and we tried running UMTP > servers at both of our own sites, all to no avail. > > It seems to be the case that if you have working multicast, the AG Connector > agent notices this and reverts to multicast. Is this true? > > We're using the set-up with what seems to be half-broken multicast: > Edinburgh can see Stuttgart, but Stuttgart can't see Edinburgh. When > Edinburgh connects with UMTP, the server (in Stuttgart, on a different > network) claims "You are multicast-reachable from Server." and apparently > reverts to multicast. > > Has anyone else observed this behaviour? Is this a bug in AG Connector? > > Thanks, > > /\ |) /\ |\/| > > -- > Dr Adam Carter, Applications Consultant, EPCC, The University of Edinburgh > a...@epcc.ed.ac.uk | +44 131 650 6009 | > http://www.epcc.ed.ac.uk/~adam > >
