can we make a statement on this, I actually get this question with each meeting...
>Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:19:30 -0500 >From: Jennifer Teig von Hoffman <j...@bu.edu> >User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) >X-Accept-Language: en-us, en >To: "'ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov'" <ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov> >Subject: [AG-TECH] text backchannel confusion >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mailgw.mcs.anl.gov >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 > tests=USER_AGENT > version=2.55 >X-Spam-Level: >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) >Sender: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov > >Hi everybody, and especially ANL folks, > >I'm a bit confused about what we're all supposed to be doing for text >backchannel communications in present-day AG 2. Were the SC Global >instructions meant to be generalized to ongoing use, until jabber is >integrated into the Venue Client? > >http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/fl/research/accessgrid/software/jabber.html > >My hunch is that this is the case, but I'm not sure. Plus if that's the >case I don't think it's widely understood, so I'm wondering if I should >throw together an AGDP document to replace my "Venues MOO" doc, about >backchannel use in general. > >- Jennifer > . mary fritsch . futures lab . mcs . argonne national lab . 630 252 5297 .
