howdy. on and off i've been testing a BridgeServer with a VenueServer i have running. both servers are running on the same machine for the tests. the machine is Fedora core2 linux running well behaved AG2.3beta.
before i start the BridgeServer, my VenueServer works well. after i start the BridgeServer that is pointing at my VenueServer, the VenueServer ceases to start services properly. if i start a VenueClient and go to my bridge- enabled VenueServer's virtual venues, neither RAT nor VIC will fire up. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ my BridgeServer complains: using multicast ucport[data]=46238 ucport[rtcp]=46239 mcport[data]=59936 mcport[rtcp]=59937 making multicast port[0] making multicast port[1] No bridge.acl file found, no ACL set ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ my VenueClient complains: resource defaultTTL Vic bind: Address already in use rat-4.2.22-media: main_engine.c:200: rendezvous_with_controller: Assertion `sp[i]->rtp_session[0] != ((void *)0)' failed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ as soon as i kill the BridgeServer and re-connect to the VenueServer with a VenueClient, all of the services come up fine. i'm sure that it is a good idea to run both a VenueServer and its BridgeServer on the same machine. i only have 1 good FC2 machine at the moment. are both servers competing for the same IO ports? thanks. --fred
