hi Doug. No hay Problema.
i'll grab them later this morning (Chicago time) and test them on my test system. thanks very much. --fred On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:26PM, Douglas Kosovic said: > Hi Fred, > > My apologies, I was inadvertently using and modifying VideoService.py & > VideoProducerService.py from the AGTk22_ServiceUpdate.zip file rather > than CVS. > > New modified versions of VideoService.py & VideoProducerService.py can > be found at: > > http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~agn/ag_fedora/FC2/unstable/patches/ > > > this is a very interesting and promising upgrade of VideoServer.py > > VideoProducerService.py, on the other hand, is still languishing on my > > system. > > on one hand, your new VideoService.py breaks your previous patch's correct > > loading of the 'port' field in the [serviceconfig] for VideoService. > > 'same with VideoProducerService. The Venue Client comes up with a Service > > Manger where those fields are, again, defaulting to 'Television'. > > more importantly in my opionion, however, once those configurations are > > changed in the Configuration GUI for those services, the changes are > > transmitted correctly to VIC for VideoService. VideoProducerService still > > comes up defaulting to 'Composite1'. > > Hopefully it's fixed now, but I didn't get much chance today to to test > if there are still problems with the Configuration GUI for those > services. > > > Cheers, > Doug >