I may have found an answer to my quality issue. I was under the impression (obviously in error) that the BNC connectors on the 4400 were generating S-Video - NOT! - they are composite outputs (I should have read the card specs more closely - my bad). When I connect the Canon cameras over a composite connection they look quite nice. I had a single conductor conversion cable to S-Video in the mix, and I was connecting the cameras via their S-Video connection, rather than the composite.
As far as the grey border goes, here's an example of registry settings for HKEY_CURRENT_USER that will set the size to CIF (and also set the sources for the four vic streams). You sould apply this AFTER you've started up the Venue Client and added the VideoConsumer streams for the 4 connections. You can just use parts of this if you wish. Obviously, you should be comfortable tweaking the registry. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Winnov\Videum\vic.exe0] "Width"=dword:00000160 "Height"=dword:00000120 "Compression"=dword:00000002 "Source"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Winnov\Videum\vic.exe1] "Width"=dword:00000160 "Height"=dword:00000120 "Compression"=dword:00000002 "Source"=dword:00000001 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Winnov\Videum\vic.exe2] "Width"=dword:00000160 "Height"=dword:00000120 "Compression"=dword:00000002 "Source"=dword:00000002 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Winnov\Videum\vic.exe3] "Width"=dword:00000160 "Height"=dword:00000120 "Compression"=dword:00000002 "Source"=dword:00000003 Hope this helps. -randy At 08:04 AM 4/30/2004, Osland, CD (Chris) wrote: >We're running a Winnov 4400 with two cameras (and have tested with >4) under Windows XP and are getting good reports of our video >quality from remote sites. I haven't looked for a way of getting >rid of the grey (gray!) surrounds yet, though. > >Cheers > >Chris > >____________________________________________________________________ >Chris Osland Office tel: +44 >(0) 1235 446565 >Digital Media and Access Grid Medialab tel: +44 (0) >1235 446459 >BIT Department Access Grid room tel: +44 >(0) 1235 445666 >e-mail: c.d.osl...@rl.ac.uk Fax: +44 >(0) 1235 445597 >CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (Bldg. R18) >Chilton, DIDCOT, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK >[The contents of this email are confidential and are for the use of the >intended recipient only. >If you are not the intended recipient do not take any action on it or show >it to anyone else, >but return this email to the sender and delete your copy of it.] > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov]On > > Behalf Of Randy Groves > > Sent: 06 April 2004 23:06 > > To: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov > > Subject: [AG-TECH] Quality of video in vic from Videum boards > > > > > > I have to say that I'm not real impressed with the quality of > > the video > > that I see in the vic that is captured from a Winnov 1000 VO. > > I also seem > > to remember thinking the same thing when I first saw the > > output in the vic > > that came from a Winnov 4400. I just installed one in a > > machine that also > > has two Osprey 100 cards, and the difference is quite > > apparent. The video > > in the vics from the Ospreys is clean and not pixelated at > > all. The video > > from the vic that is coming from the Videum is quite pixelated. > > > > Is this just a basic problem? Or is there a configuration > > that I'm not > > getting right? Am I correct in thinking that the video > > output format from > > the card is significant to vic? And if so, what is the > > optimum setting for > > this? I've played with all that the Videum exposes (with > > VidCap32), but it > > doesn't seem to make much difference. Leave aside the fact that the > > configuration tools for the Videum cards don't seem to have > > the same set of > > option tweaking capability that VidCap32 has, for instance. > > And since > > there doesn't seem to be a way to modify these, you are left > > with making > > registry hacks. > > > > I thought that Winnov was supposed to have superior Windows > > drivers, but so > > far I'm not that impressed. > > > > -randy > > > >
