In case you guys were tracking this, we're bumping to 2.3 in this release;
we'll support both (mostly), but 2.3 will be something you can use easily
now.

--Ivan 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan R. Judson [mailto:jud...@mcs.anl.gov] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:33 AM
> To: heil...@indiana.edu; 'Steve Gallo'
> Cc: 'agtk'
> Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] Python 2.3
> 
> 
> The python 2.2 path is hardcoded in the installer, not in the 
> actual code. If you grab the code from cvs it'll work fine. 
> You will have to manually install the auxillary modules, but 
> in the case of python 2.3 you do *not* need the logging 
> module (it's included in 2.3).
> 
> We're working on a python version independent installer for 
> the next release :-)
> 
> --Ivan
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Randy Heiland
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:15 AM
> > To: Steve Gallo
> > Cc: agtk
> > Subject: RE: [AG-TECH] Python 2.3
> > 
> > Actually, I searched for such a hardcoded path, so that I 
> might tweak 
> > it (just call me "Mr. Dangerous"), but was unable to find one.
> > 
> > Randy
> > 
> > On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 10:11, Steve Gallo wrote:
> > > I had tried this during an AG 2.1.2 install but the 
> install failed 
> > > because of a hard-coded path to the Python 2.2 directory so
> > I backed
> > > off to Python 2.2
> > > 
> > > Steve
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov
> > [mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov]On
> > > > Behalf Of Randy Heiland
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:40 AM
> > > > To: agtk
> > > > Subject: [AG-TECH] Python 2.3
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Apologies if this has been asked before - a quick search
> > here turned
> > > > up empty -
> > > > 
> > http://agmailarchivers.ncsa.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/agmailarchivers/searcha
> > > > rchive.pl?type=MAIL&&archive=AGTECH&&username=ANONYMOUS
> > > >
> > > > but, can I install the AGTk if I've got Python 2.3
> > instead of 2.2?  
> > > > More generally, I've recently replaced my ActiveState 
> Python 2.2 
> > > > with the Enthought 2.3 version (yes, I've violated the first 
> > > > dependency in the AG Setup docs).  Not sure what "Win32
> > extensions" 
> > > > might be provided in the ActiveState version that aren't
> > in the Enthought version, if any.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Randy
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to