Michael, I actually think we should consider moving to a jabber (XMPP-based) chat instead. This would provide something that worked inside and outside the AG and had many other modern features. I plan to present this position at the AG retreat. This presentation would provide a good opportunity for us all to discuss what we want to have chat be in the future and what capabilities it should have.
Deb Michael Daw wrote: > It seems to me that the Mud is the only interoperational text chat there is. > In meetings that I have any hand in organising, I insist on people using the > Mud, whether they're using AG1, AG2, VRVS, vic & rat, or the Insors Grid. It > would be great to see it re-integrated into the standard ANL software... > > --Mike > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov >>[mailto:owner-ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Randy Groves >>Sent: 23 April 2004 01:01 >>To: ag-t...@mcs.anl.gov >>Subject: [AG-TECH] Will the Moo resurface? >> >>An interesting observation - how many people still do their >>back chat in the Mud and not in the AG2 message facility? >>How many people prefer the Mud? Any plans to re-incorporate >>the Mud into the AG? >> >>-randy >> >> >> >> > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Deb Agarwal e-mail:daagar...@lbl.gov MS50B-2239 phone :(510)486-7078 Lawrence Berkeley National Lab URL: http://www-itg.lbl.gov/~deba Berkeley, CA 94720 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
