On 21/08/2009 12:51 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: >Just to be clear, what Alex is proposing is > two interfaces: > IAccessibleTable2, minus 8 methods that take an accessible as an [in]: > columnExtent, columnHeaderCells, columnIndex, > rowExtent, rowHeaderCells, rowIndex, > isSelected, and rowColumnExtents > Note: I removed the trailing At from the three methods that had it. I'm not convinced that the "At" should be removed if these methods stay in the IAccessibleTable2 interface, as it makes it clear that you're asking about a cell and not the table itself. I don't really mind that much, though. However, if they are in a separate IAccessibleTableCell interface, I definitely agree the "At" should be removed.
> IAccessibleTableCell with those 8 methods This makes sense to me. There's definitely precedent for this; UI Automation has separate "control patterns" for "Grid" and "GridItem". Jamie -- James Teh Email/MSN Messenger/Jabber: [email protected] Web site: http://www.jantrid.net/ _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
