Hi, Jamie. I think new method shouldn't replace the existing one, IA2 should keep both.
Thank you. Alex. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:31 AM, James Teh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20/06/2011 10:56 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: >>> I'm not concerned about the speed of the browser. I'm concerned about >>> the performance hit of multiple cross-process calls for out-of-process >>> clients. >> James, most screen readers access these APIs in-process. Consequently, I >> am concerned about how the data is accessed and processed by the browser. > I'd argue we should be concerned about both, rather than only thinking > about the majority use case. As I understand it, IA2 wasn't designed to > be in-process only, otherwise there wouldn't be official proxy dlls. > > Jamie > > -- > James Teh > Vice President, Developer > NV Access Inc, ABN 61773362390 > Email: [email protected] > Web site: http://www.nvaccess.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Accessibility-ia2 mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2 > _______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
