On 2/28/12 7:50 PM, James Teh wrote:
> On 24/02/2012 1:19 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> We have also agreed we
>> need to be able to fetch relations by type,...
>> though I'd like to name it IAccessible2_2::relationsOfType
> I prefer this name too. It's also worth noting that there probably
> needs to be an out parameter providing the count of relations, as
> otherwise, an AT wanting all relations doesn't know what count to pass
> to IEnumVariant::Next.
Good point! Thanks Jamie.
>
>> We had agreed that we still need IA2::relations (plural)
>> but I just want to verify that, i.e. is it still useful to get all the
>> relations when it is possible to get only the relations of interest on a
>> type by type basis?
> Personally, I don't see any use for this. I can't think fo any use
> cases and although retrieving all relations in one go means less
> calls, generating them is expensive for the server. However, others
> may disagree.
If you don't want IA2::relations and IARelation deprecated please comment.
>
>> If IA2::relations is deprecated then IARelation could also be
>> deprecated.
> Right.
>
> Jamie
>
--
*Pete Brunet*
a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development
(512) 467-4706 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell)
Skype: pete.brunet
IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), [email protected] (MSN)
http://www.a11ysoft.com/about/
Ionosphere: WS4G
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
