Hi Alex, At least from the perspective of the spec I don't have time to
make this change, i.e. I think it would take quite a bit of time for me
to specify which VARIANT type is returned for each of the attributes in
the spec. Some else could pick up that work though. Updating the
method from BSTR to VARIANT would be easy enough though. Is this also
extra work for the implementers? -Pete
On 9/7/12 7:20 PM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
> Hi. Since we are going to introduce a method that allows to fetch
> object attribute by name then it should be nice if we are able to
> return typed value. For example, if the AT wants a margin-top object
> attribute then the server could return an integer.
>
> Thank you.
> Alex.
>
--
*Pete Brunet*
a11ysoft - Accessibility Architecture and Development
(512) 467-4706 (work), (512) 689-4155 (cell)
Skype: pete.brunet
IM: ptbrunet (AOL, Google), [email protected] (MSN)
http://www.a11ysoft.com/about/
Ionosphere: WS4G
_______________________________________________
Accessibility-ia2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
