So it'd be good to put the format into the spec. Do I understand correct that the choice falls at comma separated list? Thank you. Alex.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:44 AM, James Teh <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/05/2013 11:54 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: > >> attribute:value1,value2 seems acceptable. >> > Agreed. > > > Does it implicitly mean that in case of several values the following >>> format is expected (as no subattributes were used): >>> "attribute:value1,value2"? >>> >> While the format makes sense, I don't think it's implicit. It isn't > something I considered while writing NVDA's IA2 attributes parser, so it > won't handle this without changes. It's probably reasonable that others may > not have considered it either. > > Jamie > > -- > James Teh > Director, NV Access Limited > Email: [email protected] > Web site: http://www.nvaccess.org/ > Phone: +61 7 5667 8372 > > ______________________________**_________________ > Accessibility-ia2 mailing list > Accessibility-ia2@lists.**linuxfoundation.org<[email protected]> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.**org/mailman/listinfo/**accessibility-ia2<https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2> >
_______________________________________________ Accessibility-ia2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/accessibility-ia2
