Avoiding HTML is also a plus for blind users: From what I know,
some/many often prefer text base mail clients over GUI clients.
I _guess_ that for blind people top-posting is much better than
bottom-posting, because finding the new text with a screen reader is
much harder than for a sighted user.
For the same reason, the suggestion to cleanup not needed stuff is
really reasonable.
Malte.
On 03.10.2011 22:37, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I have a question. I don't know the answer.
In a discussion of mailing-list etiquette, there was a link to an useful web page by
Italo Vignoli:<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>.
I favor that perspective, and I also made a promise (below) to use whatever
approach that worked best for recipients who employ accessibility assistance in
some form.
I am thinking of this list, but I mean for all lists that I use. The goal is
to support accessibility for all everywhere, naturally.
I am asking here because it came to mind and I don't know a better forum.
Oh. Now there are two questions:
1. What practices using e-mail messages best support accessibility to
mailing-list conversations? (or, if that is too broad, what practices
definitely discourage accessibility). I would prefer that those who use
accessibility provision answer for themselves.
2. If this is not the best place to ask, what is another place that might be
a good place to find answers to this question.
If there is no "right" answer, I can be with that. But if there is a
preference I would prefer to honor it.
- Dennis E. Hamilton
tools for document interoperability,<http://nfoWorks.org/>
[email protected] gsm: +1-206-779-9430 @orcmid
-----Original Message-----
From: Italo Vignoli [mailto:[email protected]]
<http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07696.html>
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 13:20
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Top Posting...
On 10/02/2011 08:38 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
<http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg07693.html>
[ ... ]
2. I have an offer. What formatting by senders will most powerfully serve
those on [libreoffice-accessibility]? What do those with access limitations
confirm to be the best that works for all of them? Whatever *that* is, I will
do everything in my power to honor.
I am not an expert about accessibility, but I recall that this is one of
the cases where top posting is the best choice. I suggest to have a
double check, though, as I am not competent in this domain.
[ ... ]
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
