Fernando, Great idea and yes there needs to be some rational prioritization of what work on Accessibility and AT gets done either by volunteer efforts or through grant and contract funding.
But, I think that it is daunting to look at a listing of Bugzilla reporting and cull out what are the most substantive issues that need to be addressed. For example, most of your list of priorities are Linux hosted GNOME Orca screen reader issues. All valid, but in point of fact quality of Windows Accessibility and AT support is a much greter short fall for LibreOffice users. There are three metabug trackers of Accessibility issues, organized by OS: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36549 for Linux GNOME Orca and AT-SPI2/ATK https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55571 for Apple OSX Apple Accessibility API https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60251 for Windows OS Accessibility and the JAVA Access Bridge, which I've just created. Folks should review these and please submit known issues as new bugs or enhancement requests. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice-accessibility-LibreOffice-accessibility-wish-list-tp4033567p4034225.html Sent from the Accessibility mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
