Following review of NaturallySpeaking 9.0 provides comprihensive feel of the 
product without actually using it. hear is 1 paragraph which explains it.

-----
The Preferred perk is voice macros, where you teach it to type one thing when 
you say another. For example, you can say “forget it” and have the software
spit out, “Thank you so much for your inquiry. Unfortunately, after much 
consideration, we regret that we must decline your application at this time.”
-----

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/20/technology/20pogue.html?pagewanted=2&8cir&_r=1&emc=cir


David Pogue

Like Having a Secretary in Your PC

Published: July 20, 2006

TESTING, testing, one two three. Is this thing on?

NaturallySpeaking 9.0 lets your PC write down what you say whether you’re 
dictating a memo, top, or instant messaging, above.

Well, I’ll be darned. It’s really on and it’s really working. I’m wearing a 
headset, talking, and my PC is writing down everything I say in
Microsoft
Word. I’m speaking at full speed, perfectly normally except that I’m 
pronouncing the punctuation (comma), like this (period).

Let’s try something a little tougher. Pyridoxine hydrochloride. Antagonistic 
Lilliputians. Infinitesimal zithers.

Hm! Not bad.

Oh, hi, honey. Did you get to the bank before it closed? Oh, hold on, let me 
turn off the mike. Wouldn’t want our conversation to wind up in my column!

O.K., back again. The software I’m using is Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9.0 (
www.nuance.com),
the latest version of the best-selling speech-recognition software for Windows. 
This software, which made its debut Tuesday, is remarkable for two reasons.

Reason 1: You don’t have to train this software. That’s when you have to read 
aloud a canned piece of prose that it displays on the screen — a standard
ritual that has begun the speech-recognition adventure for thousands of people.

I can remember, in the early days, having to read 45 minutes’ worth of these 
scripts for the software’s benefit. But each successive version of 
NaturallySpeaking
has required less training time; in Version 8, five minutes was all it took.

And now they’ve topped that: NatSpeak 9 requires no training at all.

I gave it a test. After a fresh installation of the software, I opened a random 
page in a book and read a 1,000-word passage — without doing any training.

The software got 11 words wrong, which means it got 98.9 percent of the passage 
correct. Some of those errors were forgivable, like when it heard “typology”
instead of “topology.”

But Nuance says that you’ll get even better accuracy if you do read one of the 
training scripts, so I tried that, too. I trained the software by reading
its “Alice in Wonderland” excerpt. This time, when I read the same 1,000 words 
from my book, only six errors popped up. That’s 99.4 percent correct.

The best part is that these are the lowest accuracy rates you’ll get, because 
the software gets smarter the more you use it — or, rather, the more you correct
its errors.

You do this entirely by voice. You say, “correct ‘typology,’ ” for example; 
beneath that word on the screen, a numbered menu of alternate transcriptions
pops up. You see that alternate 1 is “topology,” for example, so you say 
“choose 1.” The software instantly corrects the word, learns from its mistake
and deposits your blinking insertion point back at the point where you stopped 
dictating, ready for more.

Over time, therefore, the accuracy improves. When I tried the same 1,000-word 
excerpt after importing my time-polished voice files from Version 8, I got
99.6 percent accuracy. That’s four words wrong out of a thousand — including, 
of course, “topology.”

For this reason, it doesn’t much matter whether or not you skip the initial 
training; the accuracy of the two approaches will eventually converge toward
100 percent.

NatSpeak 9 is remarkable for a second reason, too: it’s a new version 
containing very little new.

Yes, they’ve eliminated the training requirement. And yes, the new NatSpeak is 
20 percent more accurate than before if you do the initial training. Then
again, what’s a 20 percent improvement in a program that’s already 99.4 percent 
accurate — 99.5? That’s maybe one less error every 1,000 words.

(Nuance has done some clever engineering to wring these additional drops of 
accuracy out of the program. For example, the program has always used context
to determine a word’s identity, taking into account the two or three words on 
either side of it to distinguish, say, “bear” from “bare.” The company says
that Version 9 scans an even greater swath of the surrounding words.)

But the rest of the changes are minor. The top-of-the-screen toolbar has shed 
the squared-off Windows 3.1 look in favor of a more rounded Windows Vista
look. You can now use certain Bluetooth wireless headsets for dictation, 
although Nuance has found only two so far that put the microphone close enough
to your mouth to get clear sound. A new toolbar indicator lets you know when 
you’re in a “select and say” program like Word — that is, a program where
you can highlight, manipulate and format any text you see on the screen using 
voice commands.

At least Nuance hasn’t gone the way of so many software companies, piling on 
features and complexity in hopes of winning your upgrade dollars. For the second
straight revision, the company has preferred to nip and tuck, making careful 
and selective improvements.

Now, Nuance isn’t the only game in speech-recognition town. Microsoft says that 
Windows Vista, when it makes its debut next year, will come with built-in
dictation software.

Nuance claims not to be worried, pointing out that Vista will understand only 
English. NatSpeak, on the other hand, is available in French, Italian, German,
Spanish, Dutch, Japanese, British English and “World English,” which can handle 
South African, Southeast Asian and Australian accents.

NatSpeak is also available in a range of versions for the American market, 
including medical and legal incarnations. Mere mortals will probably want to
consider either the Standard version ($100) or the Preferred version ($200), 
each of which comes with a headset. Both offer the same accuracy.

The Preferred edition, however, offers several shiny bells and whistles. One of 
them is transcription from a digital pocket voice recorder. This approach
doesn’t provide the same accuracy as a headset, and it requires what today is 
considered an excruciating amount of training reading: at least 15 minutes.
But it does free you from dictating at the computer.

The Preferred perk is voice macros, where you teach it to type one thing when 
you say another. For example, you can say “forget it” and have the software
spit out, “Thank you so much for your inquiry. Unfortunately, after much 
consideration, we regret that we must decline your application at this time.”

There’s also a $900 version called Professional, which offers, among other 
advanced features, complete control over your PC by voice; it can even set in
motion elaborate multi-step automated tasks.

NatSpeak also runs beautifully on the Macintosh. The setup is a bit involved: 
you need a recent
Intel-
based Mac,
Apple
’s free Boot Camp utility, a copy of Windows XP, and a U.S.B. adapter on your 
headset. And you have to restart the Mac in Windows each time you want to
use NatSpeak. But if you can look past all that fine print, NatSpeak on 
Macintosh is extremely fast and accurate.

If that sounds like too much effort, there is a Macintosh-only alternative: 
iListen ($130 with headset). Version 1.7, newly adapted for Intel Macs, offers
better accuracy and a shorter training time than previous versions, though 
nothing like the sophistication or accuracy of NatSpeak. After 30 minutes of
training, the program made 42 mistakes in my 1,000-word book excerpt, which the 
company says is better than average.

As for NaturallySpeaking: if you’re already using Version 8, it’s probably not 
worth upgrading to Version 9. Most people will find the changes to be too
few and too subtle.

But if you’re among the thousands who have abandoned dictation software in the 
past, it’s a different story. Version 9 is a stronger argument than ever
that for anyone who can’t or doesn’t like to type, dictation software is ready 
for prime time; the state of this art has attained nearly “Star Trek” polish.

Excuse me — what, honey?

O.K., I’m just finishing up here; I’ll be right down. Let me just turn my mike 
off.
To unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
  http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in

Reply via email to