Inspiring read. Certainly, we should do away with the terminology such
as 'special education'.

On 10/26/15, Kotian, H P <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Keynote Address
>
>      By Prasanna Kumar Pincha
>
>
>
> I am overwhelmingly honoured to associate myself with this important
> conference; and, to be delivering this keynote address on a theme of utmost
> contemporary relevance, namely, the Right to Education Act and other
> educational initiatives --  issues and challenges. Implicit in the theme is
> the fact that it is in the context of the blind.
>
> It goes without saying that education brings empowerment; that education
> prepares one for life; and, that education aims at ensuring all-round
> development of an individual. At a deeper and, perhaps a more philosophical
> level, education must awaken in one an irresistible craving to delve into
> the depths and dimensions of life, of existence, of consciousness and above
> all, of the cosmos itself. It is therefore, no wonder that the 86th
> amendment to the Constitution of India with the consequential insertion of
> Article 21A seeks to elevate the right to education to the category of
> fundamental right. It is common knowledge that through a subsequent
> amendment in the RTE Act, children with disabilities have been explicitly
> included in the category of 'Disadvantaged Children' which by all manner of
> means, a welcome move.
>
> On this momentous occasion therefore, I take the opportunity to flag up for
> deliberation some of the broad thematic areas together with some
> illustrative examples of issues and challenges that continue to stare us in
> the face in the fervent belief that collective and critical reflection will
> bring in greater clarity of thought, deeper perspicacity of perception, and,
> shared understanding in respect of a range of questions, concerns, queries,
> and curiosities.
>
> Quality Education
>
> To my mind, quality education is non-negotiable. As a blind individual, my
> primary concern ought to be to receive quality education on an equal basis
> with others regardless of whether that quality education happens to me
> through the agency of a blind school or through some other agency including
> through the agency of a so-called mainstream/general school. My specific
> need/condition coupled with other relevant circumstantial factors will
> determine the agency that best serve my educational needs and interests as a
> blind person.
>
> As I take the floor to address this august gathering this afternoon, I am
> reminded of a slogan which I had coined so passionately years back and it
> reads:  "Give me quality education; and, I will ensure my inclusion".
> Besides, let us not lose sight of the fact that inclusive education will
> remain high on rhetoric and low on substance unless the qualitative
> dimension of education for blind students is appropriately addressed.
>
> Therefore, the larger issue/challenge here is to substantially improve the
> qualitative dimension of education for blind students in the mainstream
> schools; and, at the same time, to ensure that the blind schools are
> managed, maintained, and run on modern and scientific lines.
>
> Inclusive Education
>
> The expression 'inclusive education' has been variously and variantly
> defined, understood and interpreted by academicians, activists, and
> habilitation and rehabilitation professionals across the spectrum. To put it
> briefly, the popular understanding of the concept of inclusive education as
> distinguished from integrated education envisages a system where students
> with disabilities would receive education together with students without
> disabilities under a common roof and under a common teacher sharing common
> resource room. Unlike integrated education, the concept of inclusive
> education completely rules out any separate or exclusive resource teacher.
> Without splitting hairs over the nuanced distinction between these two
> concepts, I wish to submit that my perspective on the concept of inclusive
> education is rights-driven; rather than agency or set-up driven. While
> entirely agreeing with the mandate of Article 24 of the UNCRPD which
> recognizes 'inclusion' as a 'primary goal', I feel that is somewhere a
> process as well. Now, my idea of inclusive education envisages a system,
> environment, and institutional and other arrangements which enables persons
> with disabilities including persons with blindness to access, use and enjoy
> her or his right to education on an equal basis with others, and includes a
> range of choices such as, mainstream schools, special schools as they are
> called or for that matter, disability-specific schools, etc.
>
> What I perceive as a formidable challenge for the mainstream/general schools
> is the humongous task to ensure that blind students do not feel excluded in
> the crowd of sighted students for want of a level playing field which
> expression includes dearth or complete non-availability of Braille
> textbooks, dearth of aids and appliances including those required for
> learning subjects like mathematics, and lack of appropriate alternative
> arrangements to make up for the inability to see all  that is written on the
> blackboard, etc. Clearly, absence of a level playing field will not let a
> blind student, howsoever meritorious, keep pace with the rest of the class
> which, by all manner of speaking, is a furiously frustrating experience.
>
> Another issue at hand in this regard is the urgency to ensure inclusion at
> various levels of the education/academic processes; such as, at the
> infrastructure development level, school management level, pedagogic level,
> examination and evaluation level, and also at the curriculum development
> level. This, when done, will go a long way in improving the qualitative
> dimension of education of students with disabilities including the blind
> students.
>
>
>
>
> Role of special schools
>
> One of the cardinal principles of the United Nations Convention on the
> Rights of Persons with Disabilities is the freedom to make one's own choice.
> Therefore, nothing that militates against this cardinal principle should
> ever be done. Special schools, or more appropriately, the
> disability-specific schools will continue to play a significant role in this
> regard. For one thing, I feel it is hightime we do away with the expression
> 'special schools', more particularly, in the wake of the said UN Convention
> recognizing persons with disabilities as a part of humanity and human
> diversity.
>
> Even at the cost of sounding rhetorical, I feel tempted to say that in order
> to appreciate the role of the so-called special schools, we need to
> acknowledge that the idea of inclusion excludes 'exclusion'; but it does not
> rule out 'exclusivity' or 'exclusiveness'. At a larger level, for example, a
> boy has the option to study either in a school meant exclusively for boys;
> or alternatively, in a co-ed school. A girl has a similar option. Besides,
> there are schools meant exclusively for students belonging to the minority
> communities albeit they do very much have the option to study in a
> general/mainstream school. Therefore, I see no reason for selective
> application of the principle of inclusion to persons with disabilities
> including the blind based on an erroneous and utterly misplaced
> understanding of the concept of inclusion.
>
> It has been my settled conviction that the so-called special schools and the
> general/mainstream schools are complementary and supplementary to each
> other. I will go a step further to assert that the special schools have the
> potential to significantly contribute towards improving the qualitative
> aspects of education of students with disabilities studying in the
> general/mainstream schools.
>
> Moreover, it would be quite in context for us to remember that none of us
> really know as to when, if at all, in the foreseeable future, that dream-day
> will arrive where all the general/mainstream schools in the country will
> have a complete level playing field for students with disabilities including
> for blind students. This explains why I wish to sound a word of caution to
> suggest that it is crucial to guard against any possible attempts to phase
> out the special schools based on an erroneous and misplaced understanding
> and interpretation of the concept of inclusive education. On the contrary,
> the state of affairs in the existing special schools should be substantially
> improved; and, more and more special schools be set up depending on need.
> Let our actions be based on our shared appreciation of the fact that
> inclusion does not negate specificities. This fact is amply corroborated by
> the mandate enunciated vide Article 24 (2e) and 24 (3c) of the UNCRPD
> respectively.
>
>
> The issue that merits attention therefore, is to put in place a well
> thought-out plan which will ensure greater synergy, coherence and
> coordination between the special schools and the mainstream schools.
>
>
> Govt. Schemes
>
> The issue with regard to the various schemes implemented by the central and
> the state Govts which call for brainstorming is whether and to what extent
> they are implemented; and, whether they appropriately cater to the ground
> realities. It would be a good idea to deliberate upon - a) modifications if
> required in the existing schemes; and, b) the need for launching fresh
> initiatives and schemes.
>
>
> Importance of technology
>
> There is no denying the fact that advancement in the field of science and
> technology has thrown open floodgates of knowledge for the blind. Therefore,
> every possible effort has to be made to exploit to the optimum the benefits
> accruing from advancement in technology. The biggest challenge here is to
> address the digital divide between the urban blind and the rural blind. This
> brings us to the need of making the assistive devices and assistive
> technologies available, affordable, accessible, acceptable and adaptable. It
> is exceedingly disturbing to observe that in some quarters, Braille is
> pitted against technological advancements; and, the importance of Braille is
> shamelessly downplayed. To them, I wish to say that in the first place,
> Braille itself could well be considered to be the bi-product of technology.
> Secondly, technological advancements have significantly contributed to
> improving the speed, output and quality of Braille production; so much so
> that today we have what we call paperless Braille. A lover of Braille that I
> happen to be, I feel that a sense of intimacy with a book or a document
> which Braille ensures is simply incomparable. Apart from a feeling of
> connectedness with the book, Braille also ensures better sense of spelling
> and punctuation.
>
>
> Relevant international instruments and national legislative framework
>
> At the national level, specific provisions relating to education of persons
> with disabilities including the blind exist in chapter V of the PWD Act, and
> also in the  RTE Act. The national policy on persons with disabilities, 2006
> also gives some idea of the Govt's perspective. Article 41 of the
> Constitution of India under Directive Principles of State Policy also
> refers, among others, to 'disablement' in the context of education and
> public assistance, etc. Subsequently, since right to education has been made
> a fundamental right available to all the citizens of India, it applies to
> blind citizens in equal measure. Moreover, the Rights of Persons with
> Disabilities Bill, currently pending with Rajya Sabha also contains
> elaborate provisions relating to education.
>
> At the international level, the UNCRPD vide Article 24 seeks to make
> elaborate provisions on right to education. At the Asia and Pacific regional
> level, the Incheon strategy "To Make the right Real" also contains early
> intervention and education as one of the ten goals to be achieved by 2022.
> Moreover, while at the national level the amendments brought about in the
> Copyright Act is a significant step in the right direction, the adoption of
> the Marrakesh  treaty by WIPO will have far-reaching impact. Such positive
> move goes a long way in ensuring hassle-free reproduction of books that are
> already in the public domain in accessible formats without one having to run
> from pillar to post to obtain permission of the copyright holder for this
> purpose.
>
> One important issue to be deliberated upon could be identification of areas
> of conflict if any, between the provisions of the PWD Act and the RTE Act.
> Another aspect worthy of examination is to see if there is any
> incompatibility between the provisions of the Rights of Persons with
> Disabilities Bill and the corresponding provisions of the UNCRPD. One is
> also tempted to ask if there are any inconsistencies between the RTE Act and
> the RPD Bill currently pending with  the Rajya Sabha? What are the
> gaps/deficiencies in the guidelines/instructions issued under the RTEAct in
> relation to children with disabilities?
>
>
> Role of AICB in promoting education of the blind
>
> Ever since the All-India Confederation of the blind saw the light of the
> day, education of the blind has been high on its agenda. Over the years, it
> has undertaken advocacy and policy influencing work on education of the
> blind, has created demonstrable models or for that matter, islands of
> excellence both through its institution-oriented programme as well as its
> outreach programmes, and also  undertaken useful research studies beside
> promoting merit and excellence by incentivizing blind students in a number
> of ways. I wish to express the confidence that the Confederation will
> consolidate its existing interventions and will further expand its work in
> the days ahead.
>
> To my mind, the challenge before the confederation is to work towards
> ensuring that the initiatives launched by it are replicated on a large scale
> so that the islands of excellence created by it do not just keep floating
> around on the ocean of mediocrity.
>
>
> Conclusion
>
> All said and done, the biggest challenge for all the stakeholders to my
> mind, is to reach out to the poorest of the poor amongst the blind. Swami
> Vivekananda once said, "so long as the teeming millions of India continue to
> reel under abject poverty, I hold every educated man a traitor, who having
> been educated at their expense pays not the least heed to them".
>
> It is also highly crucial that we encourage innovative and imaginative ideas
> and out-of-the-box thinking to flow in; but while doing so, we must exercise
> caution to ensure that there is no mismatch between passion and pragmatism.
> Adopt the approach that serves the best educational needs and interests of
> students with blindness.
>
> Further, we need to work towards ensuring that the professionals and
> policy-makers are rightly oriented in a manner that they develop a positive
> mindset, shed the age-old clientele and condescending approach and agree to
> work with us the blind as partners on equal terms.
>
> I wish to conclude with some lines which I happened to chance upon when I
> was a college going youngster and which have since stayed with me: "The
> principal goal of education is to create men who are capable of doing new
> things; and not simply of repeating what other generations have done; men
> who are creative, inventive and discoverers". So, let us get going
> accordingly. Happy deliberations! Thank you.
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, SMSs or makes calls
> asking for personal information such as your bank account details,
> passwords, etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not
> respond in any manner to such offers, however official or attractive they
> may look.
>
> Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in
> this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or
> telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any
> attachments. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for
> the presence of viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for
> any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>
>
> Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of
> mobile phones / Tabs on:
> http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Search for old postings at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> To unsubscribe send a message to
> [email protected]
> with the subject unsubscribe.
>
> To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please
> visit the list home page at
> http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the
> person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;
>
> 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails
> sent through this mailing list..
>


-- 
Avinash Shahi
Doctoral student at Centre for Law and Governance JNU



Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of 
mobile phones / Tabs on:
http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to