Dear all, Rule 15 of the RPWD Rules provides among various other things that the documents should be either EPub or OCR based PDFs.
The purpose of having OCR based PDFs itself defeats the purpose of accessibility. Even if auditors were to provide financial statements in PDF which is capable of being extracted through OCR, but the output derived out of it is hard to make sense from. Apart from fighting on legal principals, what else can strengthen the point on ensuring accessibility? How do we go and say that merely providing a PDF capable of being OCR does not solve the problem? Any inputs will be appreciated. Regards, Amar Jain Sent from my iPhone Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
