We should flood RBI mailboxes.

From: Asudani, Rajesh
Sent: 11 October 2018 11:50
To: CGM-I-C DCM <[email protected]>; DCM Planning Division 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Dr. Viral V Acharya <[email protected]>
Subject: Making Indian Currency accessible--not the technology way

Madam / Sir

I am a totally blind Indian citizen using currency.
I have come to know that to solve the long-standing problem of inaccessibility 
of INR Notes for the blind, RBI is mulling coming up with some technological 
solution like some app or so.

There were times when all INR notes were easily identifiable as they had 
different sizes.
In the mad rush for modernization and sophistication, we have given up much 
that was intuitively simple and useful.
The same holds true about INR notes which are almost uniform in size now which 
makes it a hell for blind and senior citizens to use them.

I have already tried to use some of the apps which identify denomination of INR.
Their results are not at all satisfactory.
OCR has not yet advanced enough to call it fool-proof.

Moreover, it is totally impracticable to use an app with a device in crowded 
transport, moving vehicle, Indian streets and in any typical Indian scenario of 
give and take.
Taking out the mobile device, holding it and focusing on the note and hering 
the results all involve almost a superhuman effort for a blind person in the 
cacophony that is India, while simultaneously being mobile and oriented without 
seeing.
We have come across many instances where mobile phones have been snatched from 
the hands of blind users when they were making calls.
This type of scenarios may not be prevalent from those countries were you were 
referring to while using technology intervention.

Besides, for a vast majority of blind citizens, it is beyond their means to buy 
a smart phone  at present, unless of course, the central bank has a plan of 
providing it along with app free of charge, Smile!
There are many blind persons who are into hawking low priced items. Their 
working conditions is extremely challenging. If they were to use only such 
devices their output would fall substantially and thereby lower their income 
which itself is paultry. Far from it being a progressive measure it would in 
reality be an extremely regressive step.

I would like to place it on record that I in unmistakable terms reject the 
approach of using technology intervention as a primary mechanism of 
identification in determining the  denomination.
This can be best a secondary or tertiary approach.


The stationary used on international currency are polymer based which makes it 
the symbols crisp and easy to identify. The material used presently is not 
suitable for it especially in our climatic conditions.

International standards have called for 10mm distinction between the nearest 
currency and we strongly support for this to be observed in our currency.

It is also wrong to say that use of physical currency is on the decline.
Statistically the propensity to use paper currency continues to be on the rise 
As is evident from the RBI annual report for 2017-2018:
VIII.2 The value of banknotes in circulation increased by 37.7 per cent over 
the year to ₹18,037 billion as at end-March 2018. The volume of banknotes, 
however, increased by 2.1 per cent. In value terms, the share of ₹500 and ₹2000 
banknotes, which had together accounted for 72.7 per cent of the total value of 
banknotes in circulation at end-March 2017, increased to 80.2 per cent as at 
end-March 2018. The share of newly introduced ₹200 banknotes in the total value 
of banknotes in circulation was 2.1 per cent as at end-March 2018. In volume 
terms, ₹10 and ₹100 banknotes constituted 51.6 per cent of total banknotes in 
circulation as at end- March 2018 as compared to 62.0 per cent at end-March 
2017 (Table 
VIII.1<https://rbi.org.in/scripts/AnnualReportPublications.aspx?Id=1235#T1>).””

Even technology driven tools like POS terminals,ATM’s, websites, etc.  are by 
and large inaccessible. Despite the directions given in so many years the 
ground reality is far from satisfactory because of absence of enforcing the 
existing directions.

In view of the above we urge you to work on making 10 mm differentiation 
between the nearest denomination notes which is the simple enough solution.
 Make all the POS and ATM’s, all portals and apps having financial transactions 
fully accessible.

सादर / With thanks & Regards
राजेश आसुदानी Rajesh Asudani
सहायक महाप्रबन्धक AGM
बाजार आसूचना ईकाई MIU
भारतीय रिजर्व बैंक Reserve Bank of India
नागपुर Nagpur

0712 2806846

President
VIBEWA
Co-Moderator
VIB-India

A-pilll = Action coupled with Positivity, Interest, Love, Logic and laughter.


________________________________

Caution: The Reserve Bank of India never sends mails, SMSs or makes calls 
asking for personal information such as your bank account details, passwords, 
etc. It never keeps or offers funds to anyone. Please do not respond in any 
manner to such offers, however official or attractive they may look.


Notice: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this 
e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email by error, please notify us by return e-mail or telephone 
and immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses. The Reserve Bank of India accepts no liability for any damage caused 
by any virus transmitted by this email.



Search for old postings at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected]
with the subject unsubscribe.

To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please 
visit the list home page at
http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in


Disclaimer:
1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the 
person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity;

2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent 
through this mailing list..

Reply via email to